Most Active Stories
- Next WUKY Phoenix Friday is TOMORROW!... with Englishman, Small Batch & Saintseneca!
- Fresh Housing Numbers, New Eatery On Richmond Road, & West Sixth News On BizLexChat
- 6th District Hopeful Elisabeth Jensen Moves Into New Headquarters
- Satirical Senate Campaign After Laughs, Real Reforms
- Pop Bottle Bombs Found At Area High Schools, Student Activities Canceled
Sun March 18, 2012
Wildlife Commissioners To Reconsider Bear Chasing
FRANKFORT, Ky. Hunters have persuaded the Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Commission to take another look at a proposal to set aside a week each year for shooting a limited number of bears that dogs have chased up trees or cornered on the ground.
Wildlife officials decided to scrap that proposal two weeks ago after the Humane Society of the United States criticized the practice as cruel and unsporting. Now, it's back because of the dogged determination of devotees to a hunting method that has thrived in America since colonial days.
The wildlife commission is scheduled to meet at 1 p.m. EDT on Monday to reconsider the earlier decision so that the hunters, known as houndsmen, would have about four weeks set aside each year to chase bears with dogs and to allow them shoot some of the bears during one of those weeks.
"It is a powerful lobby," said Democratic political strategist Danny Briscoe. "It's not galvanized often, but, when it is, it is incredibly strong."
The bear issue pitted hunters against the Humane Society in the latest of a long line of face-offs over the years.
In this case, the hunters had two key legislative allies in Republican state Rep. Tommy Turner of Somerset and Democratic state Rep. Johnny Bell of Glasgow. Both are keen political strategists who happen to serve as co-chairmen of the influential House Sportsmen Caucus and who both hunt with hounds.
However, Turner and Bell take no credit for the wildlife commission's change of heart.
"I think they saw the error of their way," Bell said. "It just didn't make a lot of sense to us that they opposed it to begin with. I don't know who got to them, but it seems like somebody put some pressure somewhere."
Turner said the wildlife commission simply needed to be better educated on the issue.
"There had been some misunderstanding, and we've worked through some of those concerns," Turner said. "I think we've got an agreement that we're all going to be OK with."
Wildlife Commissioner Chris Godby said it was facts, not political pressure, that brought the issue back for a second look.
"We just had some concerns that hopefully we've taken care of," Godby said.
The proposal up for consideration Monday would allow houndsmen to chase bears for some three weeks in August and again for a week in December. The number of bears that could be shot by the houndsmen depends on how many bears are killed during the regular December hunting season.
The state allows a quota of 10 bears to be killed by traditional gun hunters, but they have never gotten that many. The proposal would allow houndsmen to finish the quota. So, if gun hunters killed only four bears, as they did last year, the houndsmen could kill up to six.
Wildlife officials had nixed that in the March 5 meeting, allowing instead for the houndsmen to use their dogs to chase bears for only one week, but not shoot them.
"It is obvious that a few legislators are pushing the commission to reconsider their sound decision on behalf of a small group of individuals," said Pamela Rogers, Kentucky director for the Humane Society. "The commission already made its decision based on the best available science, and balancing the interests between hound hunters and the rest of the public. We shouldn't let backroom politics get in the way of management decisions."
Three of the wildlife commissioners who originally voted against the chase season, including Godby, were appointed by Gov. Steve Beshear late last year and have yet to be confirmed by the Senate. Senate Majority Floor Leader Robert Stivers II, R-Manchester, said those confirmations will soon come up for review. Stivers, who also serves as chairman of the Senate Republicans' Sportsmen Caucus, said he has been concerned about complaints he's received from hunters about the commission's initial decision.
Godby said the pending confirmations had nothing to do with the commission reconsidering the issue.
"You're on this board to make the best decisions," Godby said. "That's why we got appointed. I don't think anybody's going to throw you off for political reasons because you made a decision somebody didn't like. That's never entered my mind."
If the commission approves the proposal, houndsmen could use their dogs to chase bears in three locations - a 45,000-acre tract in Harlan County, a 43,000-acre tract in Bell County and a 20,000-acre tract in Letcher County.
State wildlife biologist Steven Dobey said the commission opted to expand the chase seasons after concerns were resolved about the areas where the chases would occur.
Kentucky would be among fewer than 20 states that allow hunters to chase bears with dogs.
More than a century ago, bears thrived in Kentucky's mountain region, but over-hunting and habitat loss led to their disappearance. Over the past 20 years, they have ventured back into Kentucky from other states.
The Humane Society had called for the wildlife commission to reject the proposal to allow "hounding" bears, calling it "unsporting to chase down animals with packs of dogs."
Rogers said the Humane Society would have preferred that the wildlife commission not allow even a brief chase season.
For some five years, the hunters have been pressing state wildlife officials to approve a chase season for bears in the state's Appalachian region. There, some of the animals have been raiding garbage cans, eating from back porch pet food bowls, and, in one instance, mauling a tourist in the Red River Gorge.
"Some of these bears need to be chased to instill some fear in them," Turner said. "And other states are doing it already. Why not do it here?"